Cloud Defense Logo

Products

Solutions

Company

Book A Live Demo

Benchmark Data for NIST 800-171 Rev 2 Compliance Assessment

Explore the Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring process for NIST 800-171 Rev 2 compliance, essential for protecting sensitive DoD information.

Key Components of NIST 800-171 Revision 2 Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring

What is Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring?

The Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring (AAM) process is crucial for organizations handling sensitive Department of Defense (DoD) information to comply with the cybersecurity controls outlined in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-171 Revision 2.

Assessment Phase

In the assessment phase, organizations conduct a thorough evaluation of their systems and processes to ensure compliance with NIST 800-171 Rev 2 controls. This involves reviewing documentation, conducting interviews, and performing technical tests to identify any compliance gaps that need to be addressed.

Authorization Phase

Following the assessment, the authorization phase involves obtaining formal approval for handling DoD information based on compliance with NIST 800-171 Rev 2 controls. This may include developing a System Security Plan (SSP) and completing necessary documentation for system authorization.

Monitoring Phase

Once authorized, the monitoring phase begins to ensure continuous compliance with NIST 800-171 Rev 2 controls. Continuous monitoring involves collecting and analyzing security-related data to proactively detect and respond to security incidents or vulnerabilities.

Security Practices for Effective AAM

Effective AAM requires organizations to establish robust security practices, including access controls, regular software updates, vulnerability assessments, and incident response plans. Adhering to these practices enhances cybersecurity posture and protects sensitive DoD information.

Benefits of Implementing AAM

Implementing the AAM process offers various benefits, such as improved security posture, protection of sensitive information, regulatory compliance, transparency, and accountability within organizations. Successful AAM implementation can also provide a competitive edge by demonstrating a commitment to cybersecurity and reliability in handling sensitive information for government entities.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the AAM process for NIST 800-171 Rev 2 is vital for organizations handling sensitive DoD information. By effectively implementing this process, organizations can enhance security, safeguard information, and showcase a strong cybersecurity commitment.

Is your System Free of Underlying Vulnerabilities?
Find Out Now